About
The Fair Work Australia project is a business initiative being undertaken to develop homogenised logistical contingencies with knowledge-based asset mobility.
Forward-looking companies invest in a total reciprocal capability and optional transitional flexibility. Our exploratory research points to global administrative processing which at a base level, just comes down to a parallel modular capability. High-quality learning environments are a necessary precondition for facilitation and enhancement of the ongoing learning process.
Objective considerations of contemporary phenomena compel the conclusion that success or failure in competitive activities exhibits no tendency to be commensurate with innate capacity, but that a considerable element of the unpredictable must invariably be taken into account.
On the one side we have the free personality: by definition it is not neurotic, for it has neither conflict nor dream. It’s desires, such as they are, are transparent, for they are just what institutional approval keeps in the forefront of consciousness; another institutional pattern would alter their number and intensity; there is little in them that is natural, irreducible, or culturally dangerous. But on the other side, the social bond itself is nothing but the mutual reflection of these self-secure integrities leading to the implementation of group-based goals and strategised process-based objectives, (258,229 process based initiatives have been developed so far).
Asset Mobility
Mobility is not a need in itself, but a function of the territorial lay-out of social systems. If work, living and entertainment are geographically separated, mobility becomes transcendentally immanent. In such a system consumers of mobility must embrace their participation both outside of, and beyond the world as the mind “constitutes” objects and makes it possible for us to experience them as objects in the first place.
The problems of mobility cannot be addressed unless the structural problems (ie. the instantiations of social structure or structurations that have a duration beyond normative human frames of temporality) are properly addressed. So, the need to account for geographies of habitation, the problem of technologically and architectually embodied constellations of affect that express a territory, which we call ‘home’. The resultant space is the territory. Territories are more bounded; milieu markers are arranged to close off the spaces (even while they themselves open up onto others), to inflect a more common character on that space. ‘An open system integrates closure “as one of its local conditions” (closure enables, without preceding, “the outside”): and closure and openness are two phases in a single process’.
Another problem is the diverging views, what creates the territory is an accretion of milieu effects. Each milieu affects the space, bends it, inflects it, shapes it, compound these effects, but then make these effects expressive rather than functional.
The 1970s Autonomous movement in Italy developed from a working class defined by its mobility (see the excellent intro to Virno’s Grammar of the Multitude). The response to the power of a mobile working population — a population that could change jobs to seek out the best working conditions — are the regimes of ‘flexible’ and ‘casualised’ labour in which most people currently find themselves. There is a parallel between mobile workers and mobile ‘inhabiters’. In fact, this can be traced back to the pre-capitalist land-owning aristocracy. It is a war that should be reinstigated.
